Case Analysis : Legalitites of Legal Actions Situation 1 : Illinois advert state trooper GlassWhat improper procedure was utilise by the officeholders that cause thedefense lawyers to salute this case to the U .S . compulsory judicial system recount trooper Glass unmarked genius important circumstance . harmonize to Crimes Act of 1914 a constable must not sign denomination strong (former(a) than hand prints , finger prints , foot prints or toe prints ) from a suspect who is at least 10 but downstairs 18 , or is incapable of managing his personal matters and has not been entertained or charged ADDIN EN .CITE CRIMES ACT 1914 - faction 3ZJ2001 http /network .austlii .edu .au /au /legis /cth /consol_act /ca191482 /s3zj .htm l Crimes Act 1914 - Sect 3zjWe open fire distinctly see that they didn t follow this procedu re . Prior to the arrest of the suspect , Trooper Glass was able to get a word-painting of the person who sold him the heroine , unconstipated though on that stain ar no arrests yet . The defense appeal to the Supreme Court is legitimate action because the acquisition of the photograph or the identification material is illegalThe evidence of the in-court identification is allowed , making State Trooper Glass a witness of this case . as well , it could be used against the defendant because Glass identified him as the virtuoso who sold the prohibited drug to him . Also , the defendant s credendum for selling heroin will be affirm because of the social movement of a witness , wherein it could be used as evidence against him , if Glass could possible pin point him as the one who sold him the heroinSituation 2 : Police officer vs .

JimezDid the consent to research authorize curtain raising the brown bagWhen it involves earn and sealed big money , a rationalise less search and seizure of much(prenominal) items argon illegal and paradoxical Under the Constitution of the united States , the Fourth Amendment provides protection of letters and other sealed packages because they are in the general discipline of effects in which the populace at large has a legitimate expectation of covert warrant less searches of much(prenominal) items are presumptively unreasonable there is so even when the letters and sealed packages are sent by a private carrier ADDIN EN .CITE Richard Allen DUCK v . recount of Arkansas2001http /courts .state .ar .us /opinions /2001b /cr01-458 .htm l Richard Allen Duck V . State of ArkansasClearly , the police officer made a slew and overlooked the circumstances at hand . Even though you are permitted to search the undivided car , it still restricts you from opening sealed packages . This is clear violations of other people s rights to privacy experience been stepped over and ignored ADDIN EN .CITE Boone20064 412Kevin BoonePolice search know your rights2006http / web .kevinboone .com /stopsearch .html (BooneThe evidence could be permitted to be used against the defendant because it is other legal case , the ownership of illegal drugs . It could be used against the defendant because it is inside the defendant s property which is the car , and possession of prohibited drugs is another issue...If you fatality to get a unspoiled essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay